Mireddys González vs. Daddy Yankee: Anatomy of a High‑Profile Lawsuit

The legal conflict between Daddy Yankee (born Ramón Luis Ayala Rodríguez) and his ex‑wife Mireddys González has been one of the most headline‑grabbing entertainment‑law stories of the past two years—not because of the music, but because it involves allegations of financial mismanagement, corporate control, personal betrayal, and historic wealth division. The feud has played out publicly in Puerto Rican courts and across media outlets since their separation became legal and highly contested.

---

🔥 Who Are the Key Figures?

• Daddy Yankee – One of the most influential Latin music artists in history, with global hits like “Gasolina,” “Despacito” (with Luis Fonsi), and La Última Vuelta World Tour grossing millions worldwide. He retired from touring in 2023 to focus on faith and family.

• Mireddys González – Yankee’s wife of nearly 30 years, manager of some of his corporate interests, and mother of his children.

• Ayeicha González Castellanos – Mireddys’s sister, also heavily involved in the family’s corporate affairs.

Their marriage—long perceived as a partnership of personal and professional life—collapsed publicly at the end of 2024 when Mireddys filed for divorce and legal battles erupted over corporate control and finances.

---

📌 Origins: Divorce and Early Lawsuits

The legal conflict started in December 2024, when Daddy Yankee and Mireddys González initiated official divorce proceedings. Around the same time, Daddy Yankee publicly confirmed their split—after nearly three decades together—and emphasized mutual respect for their years and family, despite the emotional strain.

Almost immediately, the personal split spilled into corporate litigation:

Alleged Unauthorized Transfers (~$100M)

Daddy Yankee filed a lawsuit alleging that Mireddys and her sister had made unauthorized transfers of corporate funds—reportedly around $80 million–$100 million USD—from his companies El Cartel Records, Inc. and Los Cangris, Inc. into personal accounts without his authorization.

According to documents obtained at the time:

• Around $80 million was allegedly withdrawn from El Cartel’s bank account.

• Around $20 million was allegedly withdrawn from Los Cangris’ account.

• The transfers allegedly occurred without Gabonnet’s knowledge after she and her sister were relieved of certain administrative roles in these entities.

The lawsuit framed these actions as irregular transfers without consent, a breach of fiduciary responsibilities and corporate governance.

---

💼 Corporate Control and Financial Transparency Dispute

After filing his complaint, Daddy Yankee accused González and her sister of withholding corporate information, passwords, financial records, and documents, making it difficult for him to ascertain the true state of his businesses.

He sought:

• Control of shared companies he founded with González.

• Dissolution of certain entities—including Los Cangris and others—because of “irreconcilable disagreements” between the parties under Puerto Rican corporate law.

• Court intervention to manage and liquidate assets lawfully and protect the interests of all shareholders.

The lawsuit outlined deep disputes about the administrative decisions, management effectiveness, and compliance with corporate formalities. In court filings, Daddy Yankee’s team argued that Mireddys and her sister acted discretionarily and without consent, harming the companies’ operations.

---

💰 Expanded Claims: $12M and Later $250M Lawsuits

As 2025 unfolded, Daddy Yankee’s legal strategy expanded beyond the initial accusations:

🚨 $12 Million Federal Lawsuit

In July 2025, Daddy Yankee filed a federal lawsuit in Puerto Rico seeking $12 million USD in damages. This suit alleged that Mireddys and her sister manipulated, deleted or destroyed emails and important corporate documents, undermining the integrity of both El Cartel Records and Los Cangris.

The filing detailed that:

• The sisters allegedly had access to sensitive communications and intentionally or negligently deleted critical records.

• They allegedly engaged in internal sabotage at a time when control of the companies was contested in court.

• The damage, according to the complaint, was more than monetary—it affected his business operations and catalog management.

💵 $250 Million Lawsuit

In March 2025, Daddy Yankee again escalated matters by filing a massive $250 million lawsuit against Mireddys and her sister. According to court documents:

• He alleges violations of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, negligence, and damages related to how the companies were managed.

• The complaint claims the sisters neglected corporate formalities, mishandled funds, and failed to collect valuable revenues and royalties on his behalf.

• He asked for compensation for lost value, damage to reputation, and harm to the legacy of his career.

This suit reportedly seeks not only monetary damages but also accountability for decisions that allegedly cost millions and compromised the business structure.

---

⚖️ Court Proceedings and Developments

📅 December 2024 Agreement

A San Juan, Puerto Rico judge oversaw early negotiations, and during a December 2024 hearing, Daddy Yankee and Mireddys reached a temporary agreement:

• Daddy Yankee regained repeated control of both El Cartel Records and Los Cangris.

• A temporary setup dictated that any transaction over $100,000 required joint authorization.

• Both sides placed remaining assets in escrow with mutual visibility in financial dealings.

This agreement aimed to stabilize operations while the legal drama progressed.

🪙 Judge Dismisses Deposition Request

In February 2026, a judge dismissed Daddy Yankee’s request to depose Mireddys and her sister, concluding that the documents and transition of requested materials had already been fulfilled. This effectively ended a major part of Daddy Yankee’s lawsuit to force further discovery.

---

🧭 Mireddys González: Responses and Counterclaims

Mireddys González has not been passive:

🗣 Painful Legal Process

She described the legal battle as “quite painful,” especially given its emotional and public dimensions. Her lawyer has objected to certain allegations and criticized aspects of Daddy Yankee’s legal strategies.

⚖️ Requests for Civil Contempt and Fines

In May 2025, she requested that Daddy Yankee be declared in civil contempt and fined $5,000 per day for allegedly failing to comply with a court order to turn over financial documents related to El Cartel Records and Los Cangris. González alleges:

• Daddy Yankee dissolved El Cartel Records Inc. without her consent.

• He attempted to re‑register trademarks like “Daddy Yankee” and “DY” in his name alone, despite being originally under the corporate entity.

These filings show that the legal battle is not one‑sided—González is actively contesting decisions and seeking legal remedies of her own.

⚖️ Changing Legal Representation

Reports indicate that some of her lawyers formally withdrew from the case in early 2025, suggesting volatility in her legal representation as the high‑stakes dispute continued.

---

🧠 Personal and Social Impact

This legal dispute has played out in the public eye, intertwining business, family, and reputation:

• Coverage noted emotional reactions from their daughter Jesaaelys to the fallout.

• Social media threads discuss the strain between parents and children, public perceptions, and disagreements on both sides.

Friends, family members, and legal analysts often remind audiences that only a fraction of the true details surface publicly, and what is reported may not fully capture the nuance of the lawyers’ filings, negotiations, and evidentiary filings.

---

🧩 Corporate and Legal Complexity

This legal battle is unusual in that:

📊 It Involves Music Rights and Legacy Assets

Unlike typical divorce settlements that focus on home, pensions, or custody, this dispute centers on intellectual property, brand trademarks, corporate shares, catalogs, royalty streams, and business governance—assets that have sometimes lifelong income and legacy implications.

🏢 It Raises Corporate Governance Questions

The dispute highlights the complications that can arise when family members are also corporate administrators:

• Daddy Yankee alleges lack of transparency.

• González insists on accountability and mutual rights.

• Trust, fiduciary duty, and corporate bylaws become central legal issues.

---

📈 Where Things Stand Now

• A major part of Daddy Yankee’s 2024 lawsuit was dismissed in early 2026, with the judge ruling that deposition requests were unnecessary after required disclosures were made.

• Daddy Yankee previously regained control of his core companies after a December 2024 interim agreement.

• Newer actions—including contempt requests, fines, and the $250 million “business mismanagement” lawsuit—are still part of ongoing legal wrangling between the former spouses.

• Legal filings and counterclaims continue on multiple fronts, making this one of the most complex entertainment‑law stories in recent Latin music history.

---

🧠 Final Takeaway

What began as a marital separation after nearly three decades has grown into a highly intricate legal battle over corporate control, billion‑dollar music assets, fiduciary duty, and personal reputation. Both sides have filed significant claims, from allegations of unauthorized financial transfers and sabotage to counter‑claims of failure to comply with court orders.

As the litigation continues, the story underscores how deeply intertwined personal life, business interests, and legacy management can become, especially when a global star’s brand and corporations are involved.